answer:Turn on the device by pressing and holding the power button for 5 seconds. After the device turns on, access the menu by pressing the OK button.

answer:No is the correct answer to whether the statement Zorro kills innocent people for fun is a verifiable fact, for the following reasons: 1. Zorro is a fictional character: Zorro is a fictional character created by Johnston McCulley in 1919, which means that he is not a real person and therefore cannot perform any actions, such as killing innocent people for fun. 2. Zorro's moral code: Within the context of the stories, Zorro is depicted as a hero who fights for justice and protects the oppressed. He is known for his strict moral code, which includes not harming innocent people. Thus, the statement contradicts the character's established principles. 3. Lack of evidence: As a fictional character, Zorro's actions are limited to the stories he appears in. There are no instances in the original stories or subsequent adaptations where Zorro kills innocent people for fun. Therefore, there is no evidence to support the claim, making it unverifiable. In conclusion, the statement Zorro kills innocent people for fun is not a verifiable fact because Zorro is a fictional character with a moral code that prohibits such actions, and there is no evidence within the stories to support the claim.

answer:Solution: (I) When a = -2, the function f(x) = e^{-2x}, Therefore, the function g(x) = x^2e^{-2x}, Therefore, g'(x) = 2xe^{-2x} + x^2e^{-2x} cdot (-2) = 2x(1-x)e^{-2x}, Let g'(x) = 0, solving gives x = 0 or x = 1; Therefore, when x in (0, 1), g'(x) > 0, g(x) is an increasing function, When x in (1, +infty), g'(x) < 0, g(x) is a decreasing function; Therefore, the maximum value of g(x) in the interval (0, +infty) is g(1) = e^{-2}; (II) Since the function h(x) = frac{x^2}{f(x)} - 1 = x^2e^{-ax} - 1, Therefore, h'(x) = 2xe^{-ax} + x^2(-a)e^{-ax} = e^{-ax}(-ax^2 + 2x), Let h'(x) = 0, since e^{-ax} > 0, Therefore, -ax^2 + 2x = 0, solving gives x = 0 or x = frac{2}{a} (a neq 0); Furthermore, since h(x) has two zeros in (0, 16), Therefore, h(x) is not monotonic in (0, 16); Therefore, frac{2}{a} in (0, 16), solving gives a > frac{1}{8}; Also, when x in (0, frac{2}{a}), h'(x) > 0, h(x) is an increasing function, When x in (frac{2}{a}, 16), h'(x) < 0, h(x) is a decreasing function, Therefore, the maximum value of h(x) in (0, 16) is h(frac{2}{a}) = frac{4}{a^2}e^{-2} - 1; Let frac{4}{a^2}e^{-2} - 1 > 0, solving gives - frac{2}{e} < a < frac{2}{e}; Furthermore, begin{cases} h(0) < 0 h(16) < 0 end{cases}, i.e., begin{cases} -1 < 0 256e^{-16a} - 1 < 0 end{cases}, solving gives a > frac{1}{2}ln2; Combining the inequalities, we get frac{1}{2}ln2 < a < frac{2}{e}; Therefore, the range of the real number a is boxed{frac{1}{2}ln2 < a < frac{2}{e}}.

answer:What a dark and intriguing premise. You've set the stage for a thrilling narrative that explores the complexities of corruption, power dynamics, and the struggle for justice. As the story unfolds, you could introduce a protagonist who is deeply affected by the latest discovery, perhaps a family member or friend of the victim, or someone who has been investigating the crimes on their own. This character could be driven by a sense of outrage, guilt, or personal connection, and feels compelled to take action when the authorities fail to do so. Consider creating tension and conflict by having the protagonist begin to dig deeper, gathering evidence and testimony from witnesses, only to face resistance and intimidation from the person in power and their allies. This could lead to a cat-and-mouse game, where the protagonist must navigate the treacherous landscape of corruption and deceit to uncover the truth. To add depth to the story, you might explore the psychological and emotional toll of the protagonist's quest for justice. How do they cope with the trauma and fear that come with confronting a powerful and ruthless adversary? Do they have any allies or mentors who can provide support and guidance? As the protagonist gets closer to the truth, the stakes could escalate, putting them and others at risk. This could lead to a dramatic showdown or a shocking revelation that exposes the person in power and brings them to justice. Alternatively, the story could take a darker turn, revealing that the corruption runs deeper than initially thought, and the protagonist must confront an even more entrenched and sinister system. To further complicate the narrative, you might consider introducing moral ambiguities or gray areas that challenge the protagonist's assumptions and motivations. For example, what if the person in power has a charismatic public persona, and some members of the community are initially resistant to believing the allegations against them? Or what if the protagonist discovers that the person in power has a personal connection to them, forcing them to confront their own biases and feelings? Overall, your story has tremendous potential for tension, suspense, and social commentary. By exploring the complexities of corruption and the human condition, you can create a narrative that is both thrilling and thought-provoking.